Pengaruh Pola Komunikasi Antara Fisioterapis dengan Orangtua Terhadap Perkembangan Motorik Anak Usia 0-12 Bulan di Griya Fisioterapi Mandiri Semarang

Authors

  • Fitratun Najizah STIKES Kesdam IV/ Diponegoro Semarang
  • Shella Dhika Rahmawati STIKES Kesdam IV/ Diponegoro Semarang
  • Cintya Putri Anisah STIKES Kesdam IV/ Diponegoro Semarang
  • Sofia Mardiana STIKES Kesdam IV/ Diponegoro Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57213/medlab.v3i2.238

Keywords:

communication patterns, motor development of children aged 0-12 months, Pediatric Casess

Abstract

Conversation is a common pattern of interaction between physiotherapists and patients. However, in child growth and development therapy, where the patient is a child aged 0-12 months, of course communication behavior involves the parents. The pattern of interaction between physiotherapists and patient parents in relation to the child's growth and development is what is studied in this research. This research was carried out with the aim of assessing the influence of communication patterns between physiotherapists and parents on the motor development process of children aged 0-12 months. In pediatric cases, the communication pattern between physiotherapists and parents is a medium that can be useful in the process of exchanging information both in stimulating children's growth and development and in matters related to other children's motor development processes. This is due to differences in the conditions of each child which will make parents and physiotherapists experience problems when carrying out therapy sessions. Through statistical tests, this research succeeded in concluding that there is a significant relationship between the intensity of parental communication on the process of motor development of children aged 0-12 months in the process of growth and development therapy.

References

Beardsley, Robert S.; Kimberlin, Carole L.; Tindall, William N. 2008. Communication skills in pharmacy practice : a practical guide for students and practitioners 5th Edition; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore

Chamidah, A. N. (2012). Deteksi Dini Gangguan Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Anak. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 1(3). http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpk/article/view/789

David Dickson & Owen Bargie, dalam Owen Bargie (Ed), 2006. The handbook of communication skills Third Edition, New York, Routledge.

Djamarah, B. S. (2004). Pola Komunikasi Orang Tua dan Anak Dalam Keluarga. Rineka Cipta. Dynamic of the Triangle , hal 15 - Anne Hill, James Watson, Danny Rivers & Mark Joyce , Key Themes in Interpersonal Communication: Culture, Identities and Performance; London, Open University Press 2007

Effendy, Onong Uchjana. 2005. Ilmu Komunikasi: Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Harahap, R. A., & Putra, F. E. (2020). Komunikasi Kesehatan. Prenatamedia Group..

Hill, Anne, James W et al. 2007. Key Themes in Interpersonal Communication. England (UK): Open University Pr – McGraw- Hill

Kadi, Fiva A; Garna, Herry ; Fadlyana, E. (2008). Kesetaraan hasil skrining risiko penyim-pangan menurut cara kuesioner praskrining perkembangan (KPSP) dan denver II pada anak usia 12-14 bulan dengan berat lahir rendah. Sari Pediatri, 10(38), 29–33.

Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2016). Pedoman pelaksanaan stimulasi, deteksidan intervensi dini tumbuh kembang anak di tingkat pelayanan kesehatan dasar (p. 1). Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. https://banpaudpnf.kemdikbud.go.id/upload/download-center/Buku SDIDTK_1554107456.pdf

Nihayah, U. (2016). Peran Komunikasi Interpersonal Untuk Mewujudkan Kesehatan Mental Bagi Konseli. Islamic Communication Journal, 1(1), 33– 34.Rakhmat, J. (2005). Psikologi Komunikasi. Remaja Rosda karya.

Sudarsini. (2017). Fisioterapi. Gunung Samudera.

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Fitratun Najizah, Shella Dhika Rahmawati, Cintya Putri Anisah, & Sofia Mardiana. (2024). Pengaruh Pola Komunikasi Antara Fisioterapis dengan Orangtua Terhadap Perkembangan Motorik Anak Usia 0-12 Bulan di Griya Fisioterapi Mandiri Semarang. Jurnal Medical Laboratory, 3(2), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.57213/medlab.v3i2.238